Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Description: Port Polar Bear

- Water Channeling-

 

 

 

Water channeling is material added to or built into the hull to disallow water from accumulating where you don’t want it, and direct it to where you do want it. This is usually accomplished by adding in material to fiber glass hulls or building it into the hull itself as is commonly done in wooden hulls. The material in my opinion should be light weight as to allow greater flexibility in placing weight more purposefully while building the remainder of the ship. It also however needs to be durable enough not to be crushed by batteries or damaged by stray BBs. Commonly foam, 2 part plastic, or balsa wood is used. Less durable materials need to be coated by epoxy/fiberglass or some other protection. Some captains prefer heavier/more denes material to affix to the bottom of the hull to improve ship stability by keeping the center of gravity low. I have somewhat commonly seen concrete crack filler used. I don’t like that approach because it limits adjustability to weight redistribution with later refits and is very difficult to remove. Essentially every ship should have some water channeling. When done correctly, water channeling can significantly improve damage taking capacity in terms of raw, heavy damage required to sink, but also can significantly improve combat capacity and maneuverability while taking moderate damage.

 

 

 

Central Water Channel

The most common and most useful application of water channeling in larger ships is building up to form a sunken channel in the central part of the ship running from bow to stern. The pump is placed within this channel. The pictures below (Yamato, Florida) demonstrate this principal both in wood and fiberglass ships. Generally speaking, I would recommend 2 inches wide running roughly underneath most of the turrets on a ship, obviously turret location varies significantly by ship, most of the time this also translates to the portion of the hull that visibly flatter on the bottom and wide enough to accommodate a 2 inch channel.

 

 

 

 

Bow Water Channel

Water channeling should also be used in the extreme bow of almost all ships regardless of size. This is usually a very narrow part of the ship and in nearly all ships is continuous with the lowest section of the hull. If water is allowed to settle forward, performance is negatively impacted and you will settle by the bow when sinkin. I advise building up water channeling all the way or nearly all the way (within 1/8 or 1/4 inch) to the bottom of the open “window.” The pictures below (wood Hyuga, fiberglass Littorio) show the extreme bow sub division of the water channeling system. Both of these ships also have a section that is not quite as low as the central water channeling but not quite as high as the most forward water channeling. I will often do this in longer ships where I want more but not too much water channeling and need the space to put typically the RC equipment, potentially the bottle, or potentially to leave room under the turrets for the actual cannon(s) themselves.

 

 

 

 

Bulge Water Channel

Water channeling CAN also be used in the bulges/width/beam of the ship but in some instances isn’t needed. Generally, ships that have the most to gain are wider or have exaggerated torpedo bulges (think refit Japanese Battleships or refit Queen Elizabeth). If water gathers into the bulges it will frequently induce a list to one side or another as it sinks. The clue that your ship needs more bulge water diversion is if it is otherwise fairly stable (with non-shifting internal components - I say this because shifting of the bottle or batteries for instance can also induce a list) but unpredictable list (some times port, some times starboard) occurs when sinking. Adding water channeling to the bulges will force the water back centrally as it takes on damage keeping it flat. A competing factor in bulge water channeling can be having enough side to side space for internal components. Another competing factor is ships will be more stable if the internal components and internal weight is spaced to some degree as wide as possible from side to side. Compromise can be required. The pictures below (wood Yamato, fiberglass Tiger) show how up to 1 inch from the edge of the hull but some times less is all that may be required to divert water from the bulges back to the center of the ship. Notably, the balsa wood as shown here is very easy to work with but requires fiberglass protection to endure actual battle conditions. The picture on the right was before the excess material in the barrier (grey plastic sheet) was trimmed back.

  

 

 

 

Stern Water Channel

The hull shape of a ship will generally begin to slope considerably in the stern and as such require much less attention to water channeling because of the shape of the hull itself. It is harder to generalize because of the variability however from ship to ship. The wood Yamato shows how balsa was used to build the bottom of the hull itself in the stern. The Florida shows how an area was raised by roughly 3/4 inch.

 

 

 

 

Wood Hull Approach

As I have alluded to, the process is slightly different in wood vs fiberglass ships. My approach with a wood hull is fairly straight forward in theory but to build a wood hull in general does require certain tools and aptitudes. It is easiest to build the ship with the water channeling in mind from the onset of the project. The disadvantage is that sometimes more is needed and some times less is needed and the ship gets cut apart or Frankensteined together. The baseboard construction technique shown in this article makes it easy for a 2 inch wide slot to be cut into the 1/4 inch base board basically wherever there is enough width for it to fit. The bow and stern and bulges are just built directly from balsa thereafter. Since BBs will hit the sides and top of the balsa, it must be coated with epoxy and fiberglass cloth.

 

 

 

 

Fiberglass Hull Approach

My approach with prefabricated fiberglass hulls is generally to make appropriate height barriers from plastic and first super glue then epoxy them into the bottom of the hull, subsequently filling in the places I want to be bult up. The next several pictures show how I completed the process for the RM Littorio. I have added water channeling to a fiberglass hull both before and after placing the deck/subdeck. Before the deck/subdeck is inserted is ideal in that it is easier to actually work inside the ship but harder because without actually setting the locations of the pump, motors, shafts, rudder, etc; it can be a setup for grinding out material later. To combat that problem for this instance I opted to do just the more forward part of the ship with the upper portions off and will do the stern portion with the decks in place. This ship will likely require work in the stern as well. Before any of this is done the entire inside of the hull should be sanded as to accept/bond the new material. The barriers are made from 1/16 ABS plastic initially superglued and subsequently epoxied in place to seal the bottom edges.

 

 

 

 

The next step is to cut and glue in foam. As mentioned earlier in this article, one could use some form of liquid or expandable foam, any 2 part pourable plastic, or concrete crack filler. Since my goal is both light weight and durable, I use a 2 part plastic that is a little less dense/heavy than epoxy along with a fairly generous amount of micro-balloons. To keep it even lighter I cut out closed cell foam to take up most of the volume, glue it in, then pour the 2 part plastic over the top. Closed cell foam as opposed to open cell foam is not porous in that the small pockets of trapped air are each sealed individually and non-communicating with each other. You can test a small amount of material before committing to the entire ship if you are not sure if it is open cell foam or closed cell, a quick test also is to put some water on it and see if it settles into the foam or not.

 

 

 

The last part is to pour the 2 part liquid plastic + micro balloons which turns solid. The product I use does expand slightly but is easy to sand back to flat.

 

 

 

 

Pitfalls

Water channeling can go wrong in a few ways. 

1. The bulges near the bow (under the forward turrets) in most ships where the is beginning to widen out significantly doesn’t have enough material built up. This will cause the ship to settle forward/bow heavy as it sinks despite adequate far bow water channeling.

2. The bulges were left too open in order to accommodate batteries/etc. This usually causes an inconsistent list that looks different every sink.

3. The central channel is left too narrow. I use 2 inches of width whenever I can. Internal components can block the flow of water creating a bulk head like situation which can cause inconsistent damage taking. This is becoming less common as water tight radio boxes are becoming less common and batteries are becoming much smaller. Smaller ships can probably afford narrower than 2 inch central channel. Some smaller ships might use a tapered water channel that widens as it approaches the pump.

4. Too much water channeling material is used, especially when creating the central channel component. Close to 1/4 inch is generally plenty deep, up to 3/8 inch is OK, but much more than that can lead to instability by raising the center of mass/gravity.

5. The ship is too small to benefit from much water channeling and adding it makes the ship inherently unstable. For instance, cruisers and destroyers generally only require bow and stern water channeling without much attention to the central channel or bulge portions.

 

-Tyler Helland, 6/29/2024

 

Back to Battle Reports & Building Articles

 

Port Polar Bear Home Page